<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Wave for the Blind</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.googlingsocial.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401</link>
	<description>Do the Wave, Get a Buzz and Friend Connect Now...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:15:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: katty</title>
		<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401&#038;cpage=1#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>katty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401#comment-868</guid>
		<description>Got the mail below.
&quot;from &quot;Thomas Jolliffe&quot; It (an accessible version of youtube) is indeed still online, the address is
http://tube.majestyc.net/ &quot;

Perhaps, this version of youtube is more usefull for us screenreaders? I
have to test it myself properly. But if you have any comments, please feel
free to fill in the questionnaire, and send the maker your feedback.
Thanks in advance in the name of Thomas Jolliffe
Best, Katty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got the mail below.<br />
&#8220;from &#8220;Thomas Jolliffe&#8221; It (an accessible version of youtube) is indeed still online, the address is<br />
<a href="http://tube.majestyc.net/" rel="nofollow">http://tube.majestyc.net/</a> &#8221;</p>
<p>Perhaps, this version of youtube is more usefull for us screenreaders? I<br />
have to test it myself properly. But if you have any comments, please feel<br />
free to fill in the questionnaire, and send the maker your feedback.<br />
Thanks in advance in the name of Thomas Jolliffe<br />
Best, Katty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katty</title>
		<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401&#038;cpage=1#comment-822</link>
		<dc:creator>katty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 16:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401#comment-822</guid>
		<description>got some additions, I&#039;m afraid.
When I&#039;m in google reader, it&#039;s a real game of trial and error to share, 
like ... a feed post. I can see the buttons, but clicking on them 
(activating them) isn&#039;t easy. This is the case in both versions =full 
version and aria enhanced alike.
So, there&#039;s a long way to go for accessibility in google.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>got some additions, I&#8217;m afraid.<br />
When I&#8217;m in google reader, it&#8217;s a real game of trial and error to share,<br />
like &#8230; a feed post. I can see the buttons, but clicking on them<br />
(activating them) isn&#8217;t easy. This is the case in both versions =full<br />
version and aria enhanced alike.<br />
So, there&#8217;s a long way to go for accessibility in google.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Benson</title>
		<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401&#038;cpage=1#comment-821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Benson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:01:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401#comment-821</guid>
		<description>Well about the Google Wave part... Google can use ARIA to HELP screen readers to work with Wave. Even if they do  implement ARIA correctly it may not mean anything. Only the newest versions of screen readers know what to do with ARIA (not all get it 100%) and screen readers are so expensive. Also in a perfect world Google would be 100% valid, ARIA is not in W3C validators yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well about the Google Wave part&#8230; Google can use ARIA to HELP screen readers to work with Wave. Even if they do  implement ARIA correctly it may not mean anything. Only the newest versions of screen readers know what to do with ARIA (not all get it 100%) and screen readers are so expensive. Also in a perfect world Google would be 100% valid, ARIA is not in W3C validators yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Sipress</title>
		<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401&#038;cpage=1#comment-817</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Sipress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401#comment-817</guid>
		<description>This will be used by so many people.  

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will be used by so many people.  </p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: katty</title>
		<link>http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401&#038;cpage=1#comment-816</link>
		<dc:creator>katty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.googlingsocial.com/?p=401#comment-816</guid>
		<description>Thanks again, Chris!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks again, Chris!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
